Blog Tag Results for "International"

Page 1 of 1

England World Twenty20 player ratings

Author Tim Howes | Post 17th Jun 2009 at 15:02 | 21 views | Comments 0 comments(s)

England World Twenty20 player ratings

England crashed out of the ICC World Twenty20 against West Indies after a dramatic night at the Oval. Having beaten India on Sunday, this time they left their bowlers with a bit too much to do.

It was a decent enough showing overall from the hosts, despite two poor performances against the Dutch and South Africa - and these are my ratings out of 10 for the players. Feel free to agree or disagree.

Paul Collingwood (captain) 6

Squeezed every last drop out of his players in the wins against Pakistan and India, and seemed to rotate the bowlers intelligently. With the bat, he didn't quite hit the high notes, particularly on the night England went out.

Ravi Bopara 7

Showed that you can hit regular boundaries in Twenty20 while still playing proper shots and scored notable runs in three out of five innings, which is a decent success rate in this format. England relied on him more than they should have.

Luke Wright 6

Batted with success in England's first two matches, but went missing when the quality went up a notch at the Super Eight phase. Preferred as a spare seamer to Collingwood and Bopara, and did not disgrace in that department. Fielded very well.

Kevin Pietersen 8

England's "gun" player wound up with a total of 154 in four innings and at a strike rate of 152 (which means England would have scored more than 180 every innings if everyone else had matched his rate). KP had an impressive tournament.

Owais Shah 5

Hit four sixes in the tournament, but only scored at just over a run a ball overall which suggests he played out too many dot balls (as he indeed did). In short, Shah produced a series of "nearly" innings - which pretty much summed up England's tournament.

Dimitri Mascarenhas 6

Was overlooked for the final match, perhaps on the basis that he had struggled to provide impetus when promoted to number four against India on Sunday. Was also surprisingly underused as a bowler, despite having the best economy rate.

James Foster 7

The glovework was out of the top drawer, particularly for the stumpings of Yuvraj Singh and Dwayne Bravo - ones that many keepers would not have been quick enough to get. Did not disgrace himself with the bat, either.

Graeme Swann 7

The mad decision to leave him out against the Netherlands was shown up as Swann emerged with five, often crucial wickets from the games he did play - and he was tidy too. He really is a key player across all formats now for England.

Stuart Broad 8

England's leading wicket-taker was also one of the most economical, and he gave many of the best batsmen grief with his accurate bouncers. Also scored 22 runs off just 11 balls faced across his three brief innings. He must be promoted up the order.

Adil Rashid 7

Not expected to play such a major role when coming in as a late replacement for Andrew Flintoff, Rashid bowled particularly well against Pakistan and with more luck on his side would have ended up with more wickets to his name. A bit of a find.

Ryan Sidebottom 7

The injury woes that ruined his winter, and the early part of the summer, were forgotten as Sidebottom bowled with heart and plenty of pace. After being overlooked for a couple of games, really rattled India's top order with a memorable spell.

James Anderson 6

While England's bowlers were in the main impressive, Anderson was perhaps not quite at his very best. He remains a key part of this unit, however, and - like others - would have learnt a great deal from this tournament.

Eoin Morgan, Rob Key, Graham Napier

In a policy move that many observers queried, Napier was overlooked for the entire campaign. Morgan and Key were dropped after both failed against the Netherlands and cannot really be rated on that performance alone.

No instant impact from Hauritz

Author Tim Howes | Post 26th Jun 2009 at 09:40 | 27 views | Comments 0 comments(s)

No instant impact from Hauritz

At a seaside ground so genteel that the man on the tannoy feels it is appropriate to offer a lady spectator best wishes on her 62nd birthday, Australia's Ashes preparations are beginning in earnest.

The ongoing four-day match at Hove against a near-enough full-strength Sussex side will not answer all the issues that must be addressed ahead of selection for the first Test in Cardiff, but it might show who's hot and who's not.

Thursday on the south coast - the second day - was always likely to be an important day for Nathan Hauritz, the sole specialist spinner selected in Australia's Ashes party.

With Australia declaring on their overnight 349-7 - in which Hauritz hit a rapid, unbeaten 65 which would have done him no harm at all - Ricky Ponting had the opportunity to give five bowlers a decent workout.

But in hot weather on a wicket getting drier by the hour, these were not the best conditions for the four quick bowlers to be operating in, so it was no surprise that Hauritz was asked to bowl his first five overs before lunch - and initially the signs were good.

Peter Siddle and Ricky Ponting celebrate a Sussex wicket

He had the young right-hander Rory Hamilton-Brown in some trouble, but from the second over onwards things were less promising. Sussex opener Chris Nash, well established at the crease, hit Hauritz with the spin through midwicket for four. Precociously, Hamilton-Brown then skipped down the track to hit him for an easy six in an over costing 16.

Hauritz continued for three overs after lunch but was milked for easy runs and Ponting decided it was time to bring back Brett Lee.

After the 2006-07 Ashes series, Australia had to face the task of replacing Shane Warne and it got a whole lot harder when Stuart MacGill and Brad Hogg followed him into international retirement.

Over the past year, the identity of Australia's Ashes tweaker became blurred as Beau Casson, Cameron White, Jason Krejza, and Bryce McGain were all given a go - and then given the boot.

So it was that the selectors returned to Hauritz, who seemed to have been on the fringes of Australia squads for several years without making a breakthrough.

Indeed, so peripheral was his involvement in the 2003 World Cup that when I stepped into a fast-food joint in Port Elizabeth during the tournament and saw a young chap taking away a large stack of boxed pizzas it took me a while to realise who it was.

Now he is no longer Australia's pizza delivery boy, Hauritz needs to nail down his place in the side - but there was little evidence in his initial spell at Hove that he is going to have a major impact in the Test series which starts next month.

Lee is another bowler with something to prove, having lost the role of Australia's spearhead to Mitchell Johnson, who was rested for this game. For the first time in many a campaign, the blond paceman is no longer an automatic Test pick after injury blighted the start of his year.

But running down the hill with the new ball - with the familiar 17-stride run-up, three slips and a gully in place - he delivered a wonderful first over, beating Michael Yardy three times. Then no-balls began cropping up, and he struggled to find the right line to the right-handers.

After lunch, now charging up the hill from the Sea End, he was much better. Luke Wright and Hamilton-Brown tried to dominate, but each man paid dearly for a flurry of boundaries by being dismissed by Lee.

If not 100% match-fit yet, he must be very close to it, bowling his 11th over of the day before three o'clock and still inconveniencing the batsmen with good pace.

By that stage, Peter Siddle, whose fluid, elegant action allows him to bowl long spells with no great apparent effort, was matching Lee's two-wicket haul, while Stuart Clark and Ben Hilfenhaus had each picked up a wicket.

Though everything suggested that it was a day to be bowling spin, it was the pacemen who were keeping Australia in good shape.

Blog Calendar
<February 2012>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011
Blog Archive